Monday, 29 October 2012

tory mp burk is not welcome to purchase sexual footage of me that is my property 


vikingbones
29 October 2012 9:46PM
Where do I send my quid?

  • bullingdonknobheads
    29 October 2012 9:26PM
    Does anyone know if the old rumor that we cannot fire our own nukes without US permission is true?
    As long ago as 1980, Air Vice-Marshal Stuart Menaul (described by Plesch as ‘one of the great hawks of the era’), wrote: ‘Britain no longer has an independent nuclear deterrent…strategic considerations as far as Britain is concerned are no longer relevant…it could only be used after authority for the use of nuclear weapons had been conveyed from the President of the United States to SACEUR [the US general at NATO]‘.
    and here again is the repulsive burk wanting to ogle my sexual footage





Katyia29 October 2012 7:12PM
then again the copper colour could be the pennies she took
off the single mums – - -
***********
submitted
**
  • MuleyaJumba28 October 2012 9:16PM
    in other words that is highly selective. Sounds like you are trying to justify something here – - – and that doesnt depend on what sort of criticism you received
    The ones they use are usually extremely insightful and written by very intelligent people who contribute a lot to a particular issue covered.
    The vast majority is probably hate mail from angry readers, in the past readers used to write angry letters and send them to newspapers to complain about a particular article. But in the modern day with the comments tab, readers just use that to insult the author.
    The phrase “ comment is free facts are sacred” should be changed to “insults are free but make them intelligent”
    For such is the abuse written by people on here.

Your comment will appear as follows:

  • Katyia29 October 2012 12:42AM
    really Muleya is that a fact – - – so we don’t need a debate on here about
    peoples anger when they feel unheard – - – there are people here
    with copyright issues too – - – all the more distressing to feel
    that a biased person like yourself might just throw them in
    the bin in order to have to face the copy right issues
    therein – - – there are people who have had footage
    abused and the like – - – and you just assume the
    editors are little angels? your reply is very insulting
    and invalidating to myself actually and I propose that
    you have something to hide – - -
    ************

14.29
apparently joseph fritzle enders and burk are thinking of putting me on compulsory treatment so that they can ogle my footage in peace 

Sunday, 28 October 2012


Wardenhorton
29 October 2012 3:24AM
Seems to me the Beeb needs a good shake up/out from top to ... well several layers from the top.
DG at the timeThompson was told of investigation into Savile at a "pre Christmas drinks party" and did nothing about it.
New DG Entwhistle (director of vision at the time) was told of investigation into Savile at a "rather busy lunch" and did nothing about it.
Why were they informed at a party and a lunch - is this the only way someone with info could approach/contact them?
***********
cathy blight will you get your mildewed sedentary hands off my business i don't want to know about you 

davidwferguson
29 October 2012 3:23AM
And the hypocrisy and bullshit industry cranks up another gear...
The Telegraph reports today that hundreds of under-age girls are being given contraception without their parents even being informed of the fact (Since many local authorities refused to provide any information, the true number is certainly in the thousands.)
If an under-age girl is having sex then someone is committing a criminal offence by having sex with her. And the people doing out the contraception have absolutely no idea who it is. It might be her 13-year old boyfriend, but it could just as easily be a gang of Asians (how many of the under-age Rochdale and Rotherham victims weren't using contraception?), or a respected public figure.
So we pursue those who 'turned a blind eye to Jimmy Savile' like a pack of hyenas, while turning a blind eye to the facilitating that is going on under our noses. What's the difference, apart from forty or fifty years?
In forty or fifty years from now, when we've decided that facilitating criminal sex with under-age girls instead of reporting it to the police is actually a serious offence, will we be pursuing a bunch of nurses and social workers in their seventies and eighties to 'make them pay'?
*******
thats tapas ... actually chucky i forgot to say when we were together did you know that tapas threatened to harm my nephew ... 

FatandUglyGit
29 October 2012 1:02AM
World needs NewClear weapons and not NewClear power stations. NewClear weapons help people like me feel adequate!
***************
my family were right about him he wasnt joking and chucky is better for me only thing is tapas though ... 
I don't know maybe she is too late i mean the trouble is she contributes to the abuse until the last minute and then tries to undo it ...
so here we go again ok i am back with chucky