How soon before these colours are�gone and the horizon is lined with turbines, as now is the Peak's northern rim, promoted unbelievably by the same�Nick Clegg whose Sheffield constituency borders this paradise?
the colours will be gone if you rape the countryside Jenkins - - -
The first is the fungal disease threatening ash, and possibly others affecting larch and chestnut
if I remember rightly some of these diseases are imported - - -
The second is confusion over the coalition's plan for onshore turbines to rise from some 3,000 today to 7,000-plus by the end of the decade. This constitutes nothing less than the mass industrialisation of the landscape
oh do get a life will you turbines are no more unsightly than pylons - - -
The losses of the great storm of 1987, heart-breaking at the time, have been more than made good
really - - - not if it was your trees that were lost - - -
Countryside was considered to have no intrinsic planning virtue outside the 15% of land designated as national park or natural beauty reserve. The concept did not arise
what? the concept arises very much actually just because land is not in a conservation area doesnt mean that you want it stripped and pillaged - - -
Where does that leave the turbines strung across Oxfordshire's Vale of White Horse? They have wrecked the finest view in Thames Valley
I don't see a picture for that anywhere - - -
This industry has no shame
!!!!!!!!!!!
Whitehall maps each wind farm not as energy generated (let alone carbon saved) but as jobs temporarily created, as if it were a Trident submarine
eh?
The coalition government's visual legacy may yet be a British landscape littered with the carcasses of dying trees and great waving semaphores, their arms dipping into everlasting vats of public money
how does that sentence piece together ? this is an analogous crochet article - - - the carcasses are because of carelessly importing foreign diseases - - - and neglect and rape of the countryside - - - now look - - - wind turbines in moderation do not cause ecological damage and tree diseases - - - it is the big developers and prospectors that do that - - - that have no concern for local ecologies or intimate knowledge of the land like an agricultural worker would - - - that just mow stuff down and import things - - - that make big arial view maps and plans from their google earth navigators - - -
that are truly reptilian in their lack of understanding of the vulnerability of species - - - that just splice in one gene with another willy nilly - - - that cover things in pesticides and put pressure on local people to give up their treasures - - - that strip out the loveliest knurled branches of a world where the scenery was a backdrop for gritty happenings in real life - - - is what is ugly Simon - - - not the presence of a few pylons - - - for the sake of the furry cup itself Simon please will you stop this insidious hijack of the real issues in conservation the loss of real feeling and the watered down atmosphere that muffles even the highest waves of emotion to just another blue film on the screen of history - - - bah humbug - - -
Mam Tor is rather bland then is it - - -
the colours will be gone if you rape the countryside Jenkins - - -
if I remember rightly some of these diseases are imported - - -
oh do get a life will you turbines are no more unsightly than pylons - - -
really - - - not if it was your trees that were lost - - -
what? the concept arises very much actually just because land is not in a conservation area doesnt mean that you want it stripped and pillaged - - -
I don't see a picture for that anywhere - - -
!!!!!!!!!!!