Thursday, 6 December 2012


Katyia
  • Bold
  • Italic
  • Quote
  • Link
Your comments are currently being pre–moderated (why?)
Community standardsClose previewPost
Even careful writers begin to sound like porn soundtracks when they turn to sex writing
only if thats how you experience it which will come across in your writing – - -
another peril of vicarious life – - -
It was designed as a marital aid
links please – - – that is rubbish it was designed as an escape from it – - -
I started ruminating about sex writing while thinking about the annual Bad Sex awards – won this year by the novelist Nancy Huston for Infrared
this link doesnt open. The article is very cynical and sarcastic from an obviously frustrated and damaged author – - – get some help – - – dissing other peoples fun will only wizen your pomegranate – - -
Everyone seems agreed that writing about sex is perilous
do they ? Im no I don’t actually although you never asked me – - – its dangerous not to write about sex or to write only about other peoples – - – not writing about sex is like not eating if you want to be a dry old stick – - – then stick to sticking your nose up other peoples arses – - – I get more inspiration from the night sky – - – those planets have seen some of the best zero sum moments something I wouldn’t get from looking up yours – - -
**********
submitted
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nLt6bUVoCQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xw70E71G8Z8

Comments

Katyia
  • Bold
  • Italic
  • Quote
  • Link
Your comments are currently being pre–moderated (why?)
Community standardsClose previewPost
Mr Swinney said it was clear that after becoming independent the country would be negotiating “from within” The minister believed that any talks on agreeing new terms of membership would be completed by 2016. But Scottish Secretary Michael Moore believed an independent Scotland would lack clout over EU membership negotiations
“How will they negotiate an opt-out from the Euro? Labour peer Lord George Foulkes told the newspaper: “The EU’s position is that a nation becoming an independent state would have to re-apply for EU membership. “Serious questions now need to be asked as to where these claims came from and what role members of the House of Lords Committee and the UK political parties played in this fabricated story
“This incident shows that these Westminster committees and their inquiries are simply anti-independence propaganda tools, and are not seriously considering the opportunities of independence “The Scottish government will be writing to the European Commission making clear our serious concerns about this incident.”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-20623103http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2243844/Brussels-says-block-independent-Scotland-automatically-joining-EU.html
ok so apparently Scotland says that the British have fabricated
the idea that it would have to re-apply for EU membership – - -
the answer comes from Brussels yes they would – - – a bit of a
momentous thing to fabricate – - – why did the Scottish
make fabrications about the British intelligence – - -
perhaps as the cartoon indicates there is some apathy about
leaving Britain and joining the EU with a willingness to blame
Britain for the grief of breaking away really giving us a tight hug
- – - he looks like he’s lost all sense of himself in the uniformity
of the union. Out of a fire came a frying pan and a scotch pancake
***********
submitted
  • theflashingblade
    Recommend
    0
    The utterly one-sided coverage of Scottish independence on here never fails to amaze me.
    **********
    eh how is it one sided Ive just been banned from my favourite poetry board so that you can write about your
    workship oglings while having my neighbours poison me dear ….
    Katyia
    • Bold
    • Italic
    • Quote
    • Link
    Your comments are currently being pre–moderated (why?)
    Community standardsClose previewPost
    No witness or anybody else at the Leveson Inquiry advocated state control of the press.
    Lord Justice Leveson?s terms of reference require him to make recommendations that support press freedom
    Leveson has announced his recommendations. The victims of press abuses want them implemented. Let the Government know that you support the victims. Sign the petition now
    Your petition is a trip up the garden’s zig zag path – - -
    **********
    submitted
    herero
    Recommend
    0
    “Cameron has played his hand remarkably well..” Do you think so? He now looks even more deeply embedded with Murdoch, with Coulson and Brooks’ cases yet to reach court and to the public he is on the side of a press that has been abusing vulnerable victims of crime etc. He, Osborne and Alexander might be gloating on the front bench as ordinary families cop tax rises and benefits cuts, but they may not be cackling for long.
    Katyia
    • Bold
    • Italic
    • Quote
    • Link
    Your comments are currently being pre–moderated (why?)
    Community standardsClose previewPost
    indeed herero hacking into the phone of a
    dead girl is that necrophilia – - -
    ************
    submitted
    Katyia
    • Bold
    • Italic
    • Quote
    • Link
    Your comments are currently being pre–moderated (why?)
    Community standardsClose previewPost
    “The press – but not politicians or the police – have been very naughty boys. Your ‘independent regulation’ plan is useless – adopt mine. I can help you cut your libel bills via an arbitration arm but we need a law to make this happen.”
    ok i have read enough about Leveson to know that it is an enquiry into the very criminal daily activities of the press. No doubt people in other professions engage in criminal practices e.g. masseurs spies, private detectives and the like leveson is not about politicians or the police that is a separate enquiry – - -
    Leveson’s model of an “independent self-regulator”
    that is a contradiction you have either an independent regulator or a self regulating press – - – you like to knot different things together in the hope that the truth cannot be extricated – - -
    The editors were in charge, and they could live with Leveson’s model as long as it didn’t involve statutory regulation
    in charge in charge – - – wearing the trousers is one thing but in charge of what exactly the content of the papers the regulation of the content of the papers or the regulation of the regulators – - -
    Cabinet Office minister Oliver Letwin suggested that the Leveson idea of an arbitration service to cut the press’s libel case costs could be achieved by something called “civil procedures”
    hmmm like going to the CAB Im sure Murdoch and Brooks would be happy to lay trustingly in its hands – - -
    to sort out what the regulator will actually do
    arm like apply existing law to privacy violations – - – of the press – - – not of Facebook – - -
    a simple institutional solution
    no it chose the non institutional path of treating each case on its own merit – - -
    its difficulty to make statutes that cover the difference between say the Dowlers
    case and McCans – - – or those who might have been wrongly implicated in the
    Jimmy Saville story even – - – the way in which the Dowlers privacy was violated
    is a case in point – - – its obvious they have been wronged there are laws
    pertaining to that someone just needs to ram it down Rebeccas throat – - -
    **********
    submitted 1.16am , 7.12.12.
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/06/lord-leveson-simple-plan-not-smart
at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.