labouring women using gas and air
hard-hitting plot lines
intense vulnerability
recklessly threw her clothes
the poor bare forked animal
King Lear
misc notes 4.44am
chucked out
this humanity is defined negatively, by lack, rather than by the singularizing, positive attribute that typifies human exceptionalist accounts. Lear’s unaccommodated man, then, is a negative exception to a pre-Cartesian, natural historical rule of animal integrity or “sovereignty.” An intellectual archaeology of the zoographic resources of Lear’s familiar lines suggests an antiexceptionalist tradition and evidences a historical vision of humankind placed in a wider, “zootopian” milieu
n assessing this vision, the reduced dualism of animal lack and human sovereignty that undergirds our habitual reference to a “human-animal divide” simply cannot be taken for granted, because a different cognizance of the varied presence of animal form
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.