Katyia12 September 2012 2:56PM14.07 The other biq question we will have answered today is when can customers actually get their hands on an iPhone 5. Industry sources have said that it will be September 21. Some US mobile phone networks have reportedly told staff to forget taking holiday around that day.
13.55 My personal favourite statistic that we have been sent is that 20 per cent of consumers will apparently buy an iPhone 5 because they believe that it will improve their social status. I immediately feel like a social pariah with my lowly iPhone 4
Rival operators, however, have threatened to challenge communications regulator Ofcom?s decision to allow Everything Everywhere to use its spectrum before an auction that will give them access to frequencies that will allow rival services. Everything Everywhere has countered by saying that it will challenge the terms of that auction if it is not allowed to go ahead with its current 4G plansterms that have already been established though ?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/9533158/iPhone-5-Britains-first-4G-mobile-network-hopes-for-exclusivity.html
"Hoping for surprises but not really expecting any. There seem to have been quote a few leaks in the run up and clearly the iPhone 5 will be centre stage. Hopefully we will see a retina 13" Mac Book Pro and perhaps some mention of the rumoured iPad mini."oh the iPad mini ha ha
A reporter from the Shanghai Evening Post went undercover in the factory which is rushing to fill the expected demand for Apple?s brand new iPhone 5. The conditions he found inside the factory complex were predictably poor. Security guards demanded bribes from prospective employees to get fast-tracked through the system; accommodation was filthy and infested with insects; workers were pushed into doing exhausting overtime without breaks. The response to a spate of worker suicides seems to have been to replace the dormitory windows with wire mesh.really thats disgraceful managers shouldn't force you into conditions like that ?
An online survey (yes, I know) has found that more Britons (21 per cent) would take the day off for an Apple product announcement than for a relative's birthday (18 per cent)this actually is quite hilarious ?
Jobs died in October last year, the day after Tim Cook unveiled the iPhone 4S, and ever since Apple watchers have been looking for signs that the company is losing its way. One tech writer was alarmed by Cook's rumpled and untucked shirt and the fact that the new iPad has an "ambiguous" name
Certainly there are changes. Apple keynotes are no longer one-man shows as they were in Jobs's heyday. Marketing chief Phil Schiller and iTunes head Eddie Cue were among those sharing the stage during this oneJesus this is just unbelievable ?
11.50 There are plenty of you that get very annoyed by blanket coverage of Apple events. I can only advise you to read these statistics from Experian Hitwise, which monitors web traffic trends, and then have a day off the internet:you know and there is more to live than making these useless analogies ... those statistics don't look right to me ? one in every 1000 searches for one product pull the other one ? the other three quotes are nothing to make a fuss about ? 25% of iPhone searches were about the iPhone5 what is out of the ordinary about that ?
? 1 in every 1000 searches conducted in the UK last week (week ending 8th September) was for iPhone 5
? 25% of all online searches relating to the iPhone were specifically about the iPhone 5
? 42% increase in online searches for ?iPhone 5? and a 68.3% increase in ?Apple iPhone5? searches in week on week comparisons, both of which coincide with the 33.8% increase in searches for ?iPhone 5 release date? for the same time period
? There has been 19 times more searches for the ?iPhone 5? than for last year?s model the iPhone 4S this week alone
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/apple/9535582/Apple-iPhone-5-event-live.html
Response to ArecBalrin, 12 September 2012 1:50PM
It was probably Yorkshire Tea. -No flavour so he ate the cup instead?
and here eeeezzz ze norvegian prosser using my poetry lines eeezzz very gooood no ...
Katyia12 September 2012 11:20AM
creative writer herself ... a clever article ... it sets out to stir up his adult content with
his work for children in such a way as to denigrate him ... his writing erotic material
for consenting adults ... doesnt necessarily mean that he intends to abuse children
... in fact his children's books have not been banned ... I suppose a psychopathic
mind would find evidence anywhere to justify abuse claiming to have viewed in
the works of ... well just about anyone really ... you could have at least picked
an author who's works for children are suspect ... very fabricated concept this
obviously there are other motives between the lines ... if someone wants to blur
the line between adult and children's content the latter being more 'sacred' in its
need to be fenced off ... something a blurry line junkie might need to go to rehab for ..
submitted
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/12/roald-dahl-day?commentpage=last&msg=a#end-of-comments
Ideas 10-11 September
Recommended (2)This very sense of Mona Lisa’s subtle but overwhelming eroticism was caught by the mischievous Marcel Duchamp, who modified a Leonardo print with a moustache and the addition of the letters LHOOQ. Pronounced the French way, this sounds like “She has a hot bottom”</blockquote
They were not taught that Fragonard’s The Swing in the Wallace Collection allows the viewer to imagine looking up the woman’s billowing skirts. This would have been unambiguously clear to an 18th-century viewer, since a woman on a swing was, for obvious reasons of sympathetic reciprocating action, immediately recognised as a symbol of licentiousness.erm excuse me … a woman might be enjoying swinging … how dare you assume that she wants all and sundry voyeurs … this is totally archaic …
Towards the end of his life, he began a series of works about the “Faux Vagin” (False Vagina), whose pronunciation allowed easy confusion with his Volkswagen car, a confusion he wittily exploited.yes but thats a false one though …
Interviewed on Woman’s Hour by a rabid feminist when my book Woman as Design was published in 2009, I was accused of “seeing sex everywhere”. But we all do. Sex is everywhere. Even in the earnest and po-faced Pre-Raphaelitesthat may be the case but it doesnt entitle you to be a flasher or to sit peering up ladies skirts on the fairground rides … and why look at them if they are po faced ? I thought someone would probably drag out this tedium … which chews over a few feelings but doesnt really create any … course sex may be usually found in art but is art found in sex ? not necessarily … not everyone sees it as something to put on a stage …
or out in the middle of the road … or to put it another way for the simple minded ... she may have a hot bottom doesnt entitle everyone to a grope on the tube doh ....http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/art/9535702/Art-has-always-been-packed-with-good-sex.html
