Thursday, 13 September 2012


MakeUpAndShoes
14 September 2012 12:00AM
I don't think it is snobby to be aware of the fact that this relationship is being carefully managed by both of them to gain acres & acres of press coverage.
Well so is 99% of what politicians say - only that's ok for discussion because it's broadsheet material right? I think you need to have a little look in the mirror.
I don't think it is snobbish to say that their relationship should not be considered typical of relationships where there is a domestic abuser & the victim finds it hard to get away. That happens in real life but I highly fucking doubt that is what is happening here.
Actually, I agree with you that Chris Brown has been given a bad press regarding this. People often forget that men are human being with emotions. I consider myself a feminist, but like you I believe that when a woman starts photographing her own 'womans area' she forsakes certain considerations, and to an extent invites bad fortune.

& the tat is not one of an abused woman but look at all the coverage. Jeezo join the dots.
If you would bother to take the time to read my posts before being rude, you'll realise that I started off by saying there is NO proof that Chris Brown has represented a beaten woman via the medium of tattooed art.
************
and here is the norwegian prostitute appealing to be allowed my intimate footage 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.