And the hypocrisy and bullshit industry cranks up another gear...
The Telegraph reports today that hundreds of under-age girls are being given contraception without their parents even being informed of the fact (Since many local authorities refused to provide any information, the true number is certainly in the thousands.)
If an under-age girl is having sex then someone is committing a criminal offence by having sex with her. And the people doing out the contraception have absolutely no idea who it is. It might be her 13-year old boyfriend, but it could just as easily be a gang of Asians (how many of the under-age Rochdale and Rotherham victims weren't using contraception?), or a respected public figure.
So we pursue those who 'turned a blind eye to Jimmy Savile' like a pack of hyenas, while turning a blind eye to the facilitating that is going on under our noses. What's the difference, apart from forty or fifty years?
In forty or fifty years from now, when we've decided that facilitating criminal sex with under-age girls instead of reporting it to the police is actually a serious offence, will we be pursuing a bunch of nurses and social workers in their seventies and eighties to 'make them pay'?
*******
thats tapas ... actually chucky i forgot to say when we were together did you know that tapas threatened to harm my nephew ...
